No tutorial on Monday!
Lac operon BIOL335 conventions: today (Friday) I told you that in the presence of glucose and inducer you do, definitely, get B-gal production, although in lecture, you learned that you don't. After talking to Craig, we got it sorted out-and he clarified it for you in class.The miscommunication was about what we call '-': for 335 our definition of '-' will extend to the amount of expression that we get in the presence of glucose and inducer, or with a mutant crp gene.
For your exams, the -, + and ++ will be clearly defined in the question.
In general we'll say that:
mutations in the promoter, in the lacZ, in the crp gene, and lacIs mutations will give us a "-" in all cases
a WT strain grown without inducer will give us a "-"
a WT strain grown in the presence of inducer and glucose will give us a "-"
a lacI- strain grown in the absence of glucose will always give us "++"
a lacI- strain grown in the presence of glucose will give us a "-" (same as WT with inducer and glucose)
a lacOc strain in the presence of glucose will give us a "-"
a lacOc strain in the absence of glucose and presence of inducer will give us a "++"
a lacOc strain in the absence of glucose and inducer will give us a "+"
lacOc wins over lacIs....but adding inducer does not make a difference:
lacOc lacIs in the absence of glucose is always "+"
lacOclacIs in the presence of glucose is always "-"
WANT TO KNOW MORE ABOUT THE LACTOSE OPERON?
Here is a recent review. If you want to see how they 'figured out' the basic idea of the lac regulatory system, check out the first reference in the review paper!